If Iraq is being pulled in …

While the US and the rest of the West remain in a frustrated search mode for a solution on how to deal with the Syrian nightmare, the conflict has now revealed one of its more worrisome aspects. In a well-coordinated ambush, 48 Syrian and 9 Iraqi soldiers were killed by opposition forces in the Al-Anbar province of Iraq. Iraqi officials have blamed the attack on al-Qaida’s Iraqi arm.

 

This development is the strongest sign yet of a spillover of the Syrian fighting onto Iraqi soil, and a harbinger of what is to come in a meaningful format.

“Shia-ruled Iraq faces an ongoing guerrilla war with radical Sunnis, some of them apparently now fighting in Jabhat al-Nusra in Syria. In addition, the Sunni Arab population of the west and the north of the country, about a fifth of the population, has been demonstrating peacefully against the [Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-] Maliki government, with large rallies, for several months. Maliki is afraid that if the Sunni radicals win in Damascus, there will be severe effects in Mosul and Ramadi. Indeed, those effects may already have begun,” wrote Juan Cole, a prominent Middle East analyst.

If Iraq is being slowly pulled in, then Jordan and Turkey followed by Lebanon, could be next. Yet while the US’ moves toward a more resolute approach to deal with an uncontrollable situation on the ground is insufficient, a mood change in Europe that will support supplying the rebels with arms and ammunition is taking far too long.

But because Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, in his delusion — even timidly admitted to by the Russians — continues to be defiant, possibly until the very bitter end, the policy is changing somewhat. An opposition source told the Guardian the other day that the flow of arms to rebel units across the Turkish border took place in a more relaxed format.

“These were not weapons that had been captured from Syrian army bases as before. These were released from Turkish warehouses. These are weapons the opposition had purchased previously but had not been allowed to take across the border. But there is a major shift on the ground now. I think the shift in American attitudes goes far beyond the official reports. I think that Washington knows it can no longer allow the problem to fester,” the source told the Guardian.

There are also indications that there are various, intensified activities to assist the opposition in Jordan’s border region.

From the rational vantage points in the region, be that Erbil, Beirut, Amman, Jerusalem or Ankara, the essence of the calls for action is the same: this is a race against time with far too many unknowns and increasingly higher risks for chaos. Everybody knows at this stage which two countries would prefer the fog of an upward spiraling conflict.

Dialogue with Assad, after all the bloodshed and destruction, should be out of question. “[It] is a waste of time when the conditions for the opposition to join are tantamount to surrender. There is one point of total agreement, in that everyone knows a ‘political solution’ under these conditions isn’t going to work. The regime knows this, as does the opposition and their allies both in Russia and the Western world. The longer the war goes on, the more fertile a place Syria will be for extremism and extremists,” reported the Daily Star in Lebanon.

Almost two years have passed since the atrocities began. Assad, who started it, will be unable to finish it. Some others must. This necessitates a deadline.

In a recent report by the Ankara-based “International Strategic Research Organization (USAK), “Towards a Syrian Nightmare” — its title an understatement — it is emphasized clearly: “Despite all the possible difficulties, if Assad leaves power by the second quarter of 2013 (by negotiations, agreement, flight, coup or assassination), Syria has the ability to return to its pre-revolutionary situation, but it requires serious regional and international support. But, if the regime does not fall, or if Assad manages to stay in power until July 2014 when his tenure will end, the future of Syria will be in grave jeopardy.”

If the latest spillover into Iraq is not enough for all to see the warning light, one wonders what will.

Advertisements

About yavuzbaydar

Yavuz Baydar has been an award-winning Turkish journalist, whose professional activity spans nearly four decades. In December 2013, Baydar co-founded the independent media platform, P24, Punto24, to monitor the media sector of Turkey, as well as organizing surveys, and training workshops. Baydar wrote opinion columns, in Turkish, liberal daily Ozgur Dusunce and news site Haberdar, and in English, daily Today's Zaman, on domestic and foreign policy issues related to Turkey, and media matters, until all had to cease publications due to growing political oppression. Currently, he writes regular chronicles for Die Süddeutsche Zeitung, and opinion columns for the Arab Weekly, as well as analysis for Index on Censorship. Baydar blogs with the Huffington Post, sharing his his analysis and views on Turkish politics, the Middle East, Balkans, Europe, U.S-Turkish relations, human rights, free speech, press freedom, history, etc. His opinion articles appeared at the New York Times, the Guardian, El Pais, Svenska Dagbladet, and Al Jazeera English online. Turkey’s first news ombudsman, beginning at Milliyet daily in 1999, Baydar worked in the same role as reader representative until 2014. His work included reader complaints with content, and commentary on media ethics. Working in a tough professional climate had its costs: he was twice forced to leave his job, after his self-critical columns on journalistic flaws and fabricated news stories. Baydar worked as producer and news presenter in Swedish Radio &TV Corp. (SR) Stockholm, Sweden between 1979-1991; as correspondent for Scandinavia and Baltics for Turkish daily Cumhuriyet between 1980-1992, and the BBC World Service, in early 1990's. Returning to Turkey in 1994, he worked as reporter and ediytor for various outlets in print, as well as hosting debate porogrammes in public and private TV channels. Baydar studied informatics, cybernetics and, later, had his journalism ediucatiob in the University of Stockholm. Baydar served as president of the U.S. based International Organizaton of News Ombudsmen (ONO) in 2003. He was a Knight-Wallace Fellow at University of Michigan in 2004. Baydar was given the Special Award of the European Press Prize (EPP), for 'excellence in journalism', along with the Guardian and Der Spiegel in 2014. He won the Umbria Journalism Award in March 2014 and Caravella/Mare Nostrum Prize in 2015; both in Italy. Baydar completed an extensive research on self-censorship, corruption in media, and growing threats over journalism in Turkey as a Shorenstein Fellow at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard.
This entry was posted in Turkey and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s