Multi-frontal race: EU and the Kurds

 

The Kurdish peace process is a huge socio-political challenge and a race against time for the Justice and Development Party (AKP) government, and its relations with the trouble-stricken EU are marked by frustration.

Turkey’s staunchly reformist justice minister, Sadullah Ergin, voiced it clearly on Monday in Brussels at the European Parliament.

Insight Turkey, a prestigious quarterly on Turkish domestic and international politics, had arranged a one-day meeting there under the title “Turkey and Europe — Drifting Apart?”

The same day, Ergin had the opportunity to explain the current status of the Turkish judicial reform process and to meet with key EU figures to update them.

As expected, the subject matter was a blend of democratization and the fate of the negotiations with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK). Given the intensity of intertwined processes, his talk was filled with often justifiable complaints on the indifference of the EU.

He gave the example of the unopened 23rd chapter whose screening process is incomplete for the accession process and said that despite a significant length of time, there was no information at all from Brussels about the results.

Using the metaphor, “the EU acts like a doctor who asks a patient why she did not take a medicine he did not prescribe,” he sighed.

He added that Turkey had indulged in a guessing game, trying to read the figurative body language and eye movements of the union to find clues on how to proceed.

Once more he noted that five of six so-called “unofficial opening criteria” regarding judicial reform, such as the Human Rights Action Plan and the judicial action scheme, were now complete.

But, of course, all the focus in Brussels was on when and how the so-called 4th Judicial Reform Package would be passed. We were told, as were the EU figures, that it was now with the Justice Commission of the Turkish Parliament and a final vote was expected by mid-April.

The package is primarily about revising the Counterterrorism Law (TMK) and other laws so that there will be a clear distinction between freedom of speech and assembly and affiliation with terrorist organizations.

If the package passes as Ergin wants, he hopes that a proper adjustment will be made to suit European norms and a number of people will be released from prison, many of whom are believed to have been held as a result of both misinterpretation of existing law and bad law.

Ergin readily admitted that there are flaws in the package, but also added that an even more serious trouble area is the mentality of the judiciary itself. He was also keen to underline that “the need for security and freedom cannot be sacrificed at each other’s cost,” a comment in line with the discourse of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) circles.

He also shared a personal concern. Whenever we have accelerated democratization, we have seen an escalation of terrorism and it has sadly led to a restriction of freedoms, he said. “This vicious circle must be brought to an end,” he concluded.

In this context, the AKP government has surely raised the stakes, since the judicial reform process is tightly linked to the peace talks with the PKK.

The most serious part is where Ankara sees the risk of real failure with everything: If the reforms and opening go on, but the process is undermined and public opinion turns against all the good achievements, then the real nightmare will creep in.

It is not just the absorption capacity of Turkish society that matters. The judicial package must pass as quickly as possible because the rest of the year will be a race for reform and deepening of the peace process.

The declaration of a cease-fire and a withdrawal by the PKK was only the initial phase. From now on it will be about managing them. The hope is the completion of the PKK withdrawal into Iraq by August-September.

The rough plan is to be able to reach the stage of a disarmament process by the end of November. In December Parliament will be occupied with budget talks and many deputies will be returning to their districts to take part in local election campaigns.

In other words, it is a fight against all odds.

Advertisements

About yavuzbaydar

Yavuz Baydar has been an award-winning Turkish journalist, whose professional activity spans nearly four decades. In December 2013, Baydar co-founded the independent media platform, P24, Punto24, to monitor the media sector of Turkey, as well as organizing surveys, and training workshops. Baydar wrote opinion columns, in Turkish, liberal daily Ozgur Dusunce and news site Haberdar, and in English, daily Today's Zaman, on domestic and foreign policy issues related to Turkey, and media matters, until all had to cease publications due to growing political oppression. Currently, he writes regular chronicles for Die Süddeutsche Zeitung, and opinion columns for the Arab Weekly, as well as analysis for Index on Censorship. Baydar blogs with the Huffington Post, sharing his his analysis and views on Turkish politics, the Middle East, Balkans, Europe, U.S-Turkish relations, human rights, free speech, press freedom, history, etc. His opinion articles appeared at the New York Times, the Guardian, El Pais, Svenska Dagbladet, and Al Jazeera English online. Turkey’s first news ombudsman, beginning at Milliyet daily in 1999, Baydar worked in the same role as reader representative until 2014. His work included reader complaints with content, and commentary on media ethics. Working in a tough professional climate had its costs: he was twice forced to leave his job, after his self-critical columns on journalistic flaws and fabricated news stories. Baydar worked as producer and news presenter in Swedish Radio &TV Corp. (SR) Stockholm, Sweden between 1979-1991; as correspondent for Scandinavia and Baltics for Turkish daily Cumhuriyet between 1980-1992, and the BBC World Service, in early 1990's. Returning to Turkey in 1994, he worked as reporter and ediytor for various outlets in print, as well as hosting debate porogrammes in public and private TV channels. Baydar studied informatics, cybernetics and, later, had his journalism ediucatiob in the University of Stockholm. Baydar served as president of the U.S. based International Organizaton of News Ombudsmen (ONO) in 2003. He was a Knight-Wallace Fellow at University of Michigan in 2004. Baydar was given the Special Award of the European Press Prize (EPP), for 'excellence in journalism', along with the Guardian and Der Spiegel in 2014. He won the Umbria Journalism Award in March 2014 and Caravella/Mare Nostrum Prize in 2015; both in Italy. Baydar completed an extensive research on self-censorship, corruption in media, and growing threats over journalism in Turkey as a Shorenstein Fellow at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard.
This entry was posted in Turkey and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s