Despite doubts and speculation, PKK much closer to withdrawal

 

Dispersing doubts little by little, the Kurdish peace process is taking shape as the days go by.

To repeat a short phrase of mine: so far, so good. To paraphrase a source who is inside the process: “What is taking place behind closed doors is actually one month ahead of where the public debate is.”

The written response of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) command in Kandil Mountain to the second letter from Abdullah Öcalan has now been handed over to the Ministry of Justice and the National Intelligence Organization (MİT) for analysis. It is expected to be taken to Öcalan soon by the same Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) delegation that visited him previously.

 

Görsel

 

The main point is that the “Kandil command” says “yes” to Öcalan’s suggestion on a “pull-out without weapons” from Turkey to Iraqi soil. No matter how keenly some BDP actors and others attempt to blur that specific point, it seems clear that Kandil has chosen not to challenge Öcalan’s authority.

Yet prepare for further fuzzing of the issue from PKK actors, targeted for tactical consumption. There are grounds for this as well: The meeting between the upper levels of the Kandil command signals deep, understandable doubts over how the pull-out process will be arranged, what will happen once the rebels cross into Iraqi Kurdistan and more importantly, how the “mid-level” figures of the PKK’s local units can be persuaded to hide their weaponry.

It does not mean though, a big alarm signal for the process — at least, not yet.

In an interview with El Pais daily, Murat Karayılan, the PKK’s “chief military executive,” speaks more or less the same language as the lead government circles when he emphasizes its three stages: a) ceasefire/withdrawal; b) full guarantee of rights under the new constitution; and c) “normalization” (disarmament, amnesty, reintegration etc.).

It shows that he has “internalized” the rough road map and will abide by it.

Let me also note a detail that Nechirvan Barzani, prime minister of Iraq’s Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) also visited Kandil Mountain, signaling a higher level of KRG engagement.

Some further points of significance from the “Kandil command” are: a) The final destination of the entire pull-out will be Iraqi Kurdistan, not Syria; b) As it was expressed by Karayılan, the PKK will “not be on Assad’s side;” c) The peace process is seen in the context of a grand challenge in the entire region, thus as an opportunity; and d) The final farewell to arms is strictly conditional on a full-scale political reform in Turkey.

There is allegedly a strong point in Kandil command’s letter to Öcalan: Although the armed wing welcomes Öcalan’s initiative as one of ”historic importance,” in clear terms it throws the ball back to him, implying “should things fail and collapse, the responsibility will be entirely yours.”

On the home front, the process has a stronger backing compared to three years ago when the “Kurdish opening” collapsed. As recalled in a column by Hüseyin Yayman, a member of the new “wise people” commission, the overall support-opposition in 2009 was 48 vs. 36.4 percent, with 15 percent undecided (Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research [SETA] figures), but a recent poll by the ANAR research company in mid-March shows 58 vs. 34 percent. The concerns seem to have faded somewhat. Yet in terms of regions, there are three areas where mental resistance is still strong: the Aegean plus Thrace, the Black Sea coast and the Mediterranean strip. Much work is needed there.

The noted “flow” of the process, however early and shaky, leaves the political opposition visibly squirming. The leader of the extreme-right Nationalist Movement Party (MHP), Devlet Bahçeli, has now steered solidly to a threatening, escalating rhetoric that sounds tantamount to incitement to violence (whipping up crowds to a frenzy regarding the “wise people,” etc.). It sends out social SOS signals already.

Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu seems even more squeezed. He has resorted to a fully negating stand with complaints of the process being non-transparent and saying that “our credit to it is over.” The party is now entrenched, cynically, to re-launch an attack “if things go bad.” That is its current policy. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan seems unmoved. “We will go it alone, no matter how these two behave,” he said yesterday. It will be interesting to see who will emerge as winners and losers from this grand bargain. 

Advertisements

About yavuzbaydar

Yavuz Baydar has been an award-winning Turkish journalist, whose professional activity spans nearly four decades. In December 2013, Baydar co-founded the independent media platform, P24, Punto24, to monitor the media sector of Turkey, as well as organizing surveys, and training workshops. Baydar wrote opinion columns, in Turkish, liberal daily Ozgur Dusunce and news site Haberdar, and in English, daily Today's Zaman, on domestic and foreign policy issues related to Turkey, and media matters, until all had to cease publications due to growing political oppression. Currently, he writes regular chronicles for Die Süddeutsche Zeitung, and opinion columns for the Arab Weekly, as well as analysis for Index on Censorship. Baydar blogs with the Huffington Post, sharing his his analysis and views on Turkish politics, the Middle East, Balkans, Europe, U.S-Turkish relations, human rights, free speech, press freedom, history, etc. His opinion articles appeared at the New York Times, the Guardian, El Pais, Svenska Dagbladet, and Al Jazeera English online. Turkey’s first news ombudsman, beginning at Milliyet daily in 1999, Baydar worked in the same role as reader representative until 2014. His work included reader complaints with content, and commentary on media ethics. Working in a tough professional climate had its costs: he was twice forced to leave his job, after his self-critical columns on journalistic flaws and fabricated news stories. Baydar worked as producer and news presenter in Swedish Radio &TV Corp. (SR) Stockholm, Sweden between 1979-1991; as correspondent for Scandinavia and Baltics for Turkish daily Cumhuriyet between 1980-1992, and the BBC World Service, in early 1990's. Returning to Turkey in 1994, he worked as reporter and ediytor for various outlets in print, as well as hosting debate porogrammes in public and private TV channels. Baydar studied informatics, cybernetics and, later, had his journalism ediucatiob in the University of Stockholm. Baydar served as president of the U.S. based International Organizaton of News Ombudsmen (ONO) in 2003. He was a Knight-Wallace Fellow at University of Michigan in 2004. Baydar was given the Special Award of the European Press Prize (EPP), for 'excellence in journalism', along with the Guardian and Der Spiegel in 2014. He won the Umbria Journalism Award in March 2014 and Caravella/Mare Nostrum Prize in 2015; both in Italy. Baydar completed an extensive research on self-censorship, corruption in media, and growing threats over journalism in Turkey as a Shorenstein Fellow at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard.
This entry was posted in Turkey. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s