In a rare meeting, journalists from Armenia and Azerbaijan call for empathy and patience

Journalists from both Armenia and Azerbaijan coming together in the neighboring country of Georgia, a neutral zone for both sides, which have had no diplomatic ties for two decades, have agreed that although there are huge differences between the two societies in terms of the status quo, both sides need a bit of understanding, patience and a touch of humanity, a wish that can be realized through the hard work of conflict-sensitive journalism, which needs to be promoted on both sides.

“It is just like a building under construction — you set the base, so that the building can stand firmly,” Arzu Geybullayeva, an Azerbaijani freelance journalist, said in an interview with Today’s Zaman.

Noting journalists’ important role in the resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Geybullayeva believes that journalists have a very unique power to move the settlement process of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict forward, and that is why a choice should be made as to whether journalists will engage in conflict-sensitive journalism or stay among those who report on the conflict in the usual way today.

“If a conscious decision is made to be conflict-sensitive reporters, then we can be the ones adding that very ‘pinch of patience’ to the rhetoric around the conflict,” Geybullayeva said.

Nagorno-Karabakh, a mountainous enclave within Azerbaijan, with a majority Armenian population, became the main reason for the ethnic-territorial conflict that erupted between Azerbaijanis and Armenians in the early 1990s, as a result of which Armenian-backed forces seized Nagorno-Karabakh along with seven adjacent Azeri districts. A truce was signed in 1994, but there was no peace treaty. Violence flares sporadically along the front line, while the media is considered to be one of the prime sources of propaganda that not only prolongs the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and leaves it unsettled but also agitates the nations against each other.

Underlining the importance of conflict-sensitive reporting and agreeing with Geybullayeva that “journalists should add more salt and pepper, rather than wood, to the fire,” Sargis Khandanyan, a young journalist working for Yerevan-based Civilnet, is suspicious about the current state of media, as he does not think that journalists contribute to the peaceful settlement of the conflict.

“On the contrary, journalism and journalists are being used as tools for propaganda, hence they are somehow victims of that propaganda. However, journalists can form an image of reality on both sides, presenting it ‘close to reality’,” Khandanyan said, in an interview with Today’s Zaman, adding that conflict-sensitive journalism is a must for journalists covering the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, but unfortunately only a few journalists are aware and make balanced stories using wording that is acceptable to both sides.

Khandanyan and Geybullayeva, along with 16 other Armenian and Azerbaijani journalists, came together for the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict-aware journalism program held on Jan. 11-17 by the Imagine Center for Conflict Transformation, which has been organizing Azerbaijani-Armenian dialogue projects since 2007 that aim to positively transform relations between the two nations and bring lasting and sustainable peace in both conflict-torn societies.

Rizvan Hüseynov, an Azerbaijani journalist and historian, underlines the role of journalism in all sociopolitical processes of the world. However, he thinks that it has a strong influence on the coverage of conflicts, as “any incorrect wording, comments or aggressive rhetoric might lead to greater confrontation and bloodshed.”

“That’s why journalists who are reporting about conflicts should undergo certain training in which they the learn the skills of conflict-sensitive journalism. Only after learning these skills can journalists avoid provocative coverage of the conflict and find topics that can ease the confrontation between the sides. Personally, from my own experience, I can say that journalistic courses and training allowed me to do less harm and instead learn more and contribute to the reconciliation between our peoples,” Hüseynov said, speaking with Today’s Zaman.

Another Armenian participant in the program, Aghavni Harutyunyan, who is also known as an analyst for the AZG daily, thinks that journalists can contribute to the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict only if they do their job professionally and do not become tools of propaganda.

“With no wish to judge the journalists working in Armenia and Azerbaijan, I can only hold up my own experience as a basis for assessment, with the conclusion that nothing is done perfectly. Doing a better job, being sensitive to conflict-related issues and paying more attention to our wording will be affected by an understanding coming from conflict-sensitive journalism,” Harutyunyan said.


About yavuzbaydar

Yavuz Baydar has been an award-winning Turkish journalist, whose professional activity spans nearly four decades. In December 2013, Baydar co-founded the independent media platform, P24, Punto24, to monitor the media sector of Turkey, as well as organizing surveys, and training workshops. Baydar wrote opinion columns, in Turkish, liberal daily Ozgur Dusunce and news site Haberdar, and in English, daily Today's Zaman, on domestic and foreign policy issues related to Turkey, and media matters, until all had to cease publications due to growing political oppression. Currently, he writes regular chronicles for Die Süddeutsche Zeitung, and opinion columns for the Arab Weekly, as well as analysis for Index on Censorship. Baydar blogs with the Huffington Post, sharing his his analysis and views on Turkish politics, the Middle East, Balkans, Europe, U.S-Turkish relations, human rights, free speech, press freedom, history, etc. His opinion articles appeared at the New York Times, the Guardian, El Pais, Svenska Dagbladet, and Al Jazeera English online. Turkey’s first news ombudsman, beginning at Milliyet daily in 1999, Baydar worked in the same role as reader representative until 2014. His work included reader complaints with content, and commentary on media ethics. Working in a tough professional climate had its costs: he was twice forced to leave his job, after his self-critical columns on journalistic flaws and fabricated news stories. Baydar worked as producer and news presenter in Swedish Radio &TV Corp. (SR) Stockholm, Sweden between 1979-1991; as correspondent for Scandinavia and Baltics for Turkish daily Cumhuriyet between 1980-1992, and the BBC World Service, in early 1990's. Returning to Turkey in 1994, he worked as reporter and ediytor for various outlets in print, as well as hosting debate porogrammes in public and private TV channels. Baydar studied informatics, cybernetics and, later, had his journalism ediucatiob in the University of Stockholm. Baydar served as president of the U.S. based International Organizaton of News Ombudsmen (ONO) in 2003. He was a Knight-Wallace Fellow at University of Michigan in 2004. Baydar was given the Special Award of the European Press Prize (EPP), for 'excellence in journalism', along with the Guardian and Der Spiegel in 2014. He won the Umbria Journalism Award in March 2014 and Caravella/Mare Nostrum Prize in 2015; both in Italy. Baydar completed an extensive research on self-censorship, corruption in media, and growing threats over journalism in Turkey as a Shorenstein Fellow at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard.
This entry was posted in Turkey and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s