Turkey’s humbled secular opposition seeks to shed elitist image

Chastened by its failure to dent Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s domination at the ballot box, Turkey’s main opposition is looking to the conservative religious heartland it long shunned and trying to shed its image as bastion of an old secular elite, according to a report by Reuters.

His rivals’ hopes that his grip might be weakened by a graft scandal and anti-government protests last summer proved misplaced. The AKP increased its share of the national vote and held the key cities İstanbul and Ankara at March 30 local polls.

“I have decided to emigrate to İzmir,” one disgruntled opposition supporter wrote on Facebook, referring to the Aegean coastal province which remained a stronghold of the staunchly secularist Republican People’s Party (CHP).

The CHP’s mild-mannered leader, Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, puts on a brave face. Four years after taking the reins of the party on a reformist agenda, he believes it must vie for the support of millions of conservative Turks who have bought into the Islamist-rooted AK Party’s vision.

“We had aimed to combine under the CHP roof all the forces supportive of the republic, democracy, and the secular system,” he told Reuters in his office in Ankara, noting the party had seen a modest gain in its overall share of the vote but acknowledging it needed to reshape its strategy.

“We have a deep-rooted identity and past. If today we seek the votes of all citizens, we cannot differentiate among them. We need to embrace all and every one.”

Efforts to broaden the CHP’s appeal saw them select a former nationalist party candidate to run for mayor in Ankara, a move that brought them to within one percentage point of victory.

It could now see them try to settle on a consensus candidate in the August presidential race, an election in which Erdoğan, bolstered by the 46 percent share of the vote his party won at the municipal polls, is widely expected to stand.

“We’d like to see a candidate who people from all parties will vote for willingly … If such a candidate emerges, we will support them,” Kılıçdaroğlu said, adding that collaboration with the nationalist MHP party, once anathema to the CHP, would not be out of the question.

Erdoğan’s party reaped the reward of its work on social services, from roads and education to health care and refuge collection, in rural areas that had for generations felt neglected under traditional secularist parties.

“Dirt and filth,” Erdoğan said, had marked their rule. He saw no place for them in what he called the New Turkey.

The CHP, in the past a mixture of leftist and nationalist forces, has much to do to claim the territory of the poor that should be their natural constituency.

Turkish politics are polarised as scarcely ever before while Erdoğan fights what he deems subversive elements in police and judiciary concocting allegations of graft. He accuses a US-based cleric of running a terrorist organisation in cahoots with major opposition parties he labels an “alliance of evil”.

“Vast spaces of conservatism”

The CHP’s voter base has been largely confined to a secular-minded, urban middle class. It controls towns on the Aegean coast and mobilises large numbers in the cosmopolitan centres of Ankara and İstanbul, but little is done to lure the significant Kurdish vote, and the party is almost non-existent in the windswept expanses of the central and eastern Anatolian plains.

Jonathan Friedman, lead Turkey analyst for London-based Control Risks, doubts whether opposition party leaders would be willing to sacrifice their own power in seeking a united front.

“I wouldn’t underestimate the opposition’s inability to cooperate. People are united in being anti-Erdoğan but haven’t managed to move beyond that to be ‘for’ something,” he said.

“There is no real sign they’re trying to bring in fresh blood and fresh thinking to move beyond the symbolic politics of the past — waving the flag of Atatürk – and start trying to appeal more seriously to Turkey’s Anatolian heartland.”

CHP’s lack of appeal has been compounded by a patchy record on minority rights, support for an army that often meddled in politics and – at least until recently – strong opposition to religious symbols such as the Islamic head scarf.

Debate over the role of religion still weighs on Turkish politics more than 90 years after Atatürk founded a secular republic in which Islam was largely banished from public life, with head scarves banned for civil servants until last year, and strict controls imposed on religious teachings.

Erdoğan has worked hard to re-establish religion at the heart of public life, creating a potent political brand in the process, part economic aspiration, part religious conservatism, the bedrock of his support during 11 years in office.

“We’ve tried pretty much everything. It was a mediocre performance,” Aykan Erdemir, a CHP member of parliament and anthropologist, said of the March election outcome.

CHP, virtually powerless in parliament, has become a gerontocracy out of touch with a youthful electorate, he said.

“The CHP needs to bring in young people. Young people need to pronounce young ideas, then it’ll be convincing,” he said, arguing this could bring the party closer to the 40 percent threshold it would need to pose any serious threat to Erdoğan.

Even then, it would still face a problem convincing the “vast empty spaces of conservatism” in the heart of the country that would likely never vote CHP.

Some CHP officials privately admit that if they are to win the votes of conservative masses, they must put more distance between themselves and the legacy and imagery of Ataturk. That could stir discontent in the strongly secularist wing.

Erdoğan’s pious core supporters fear any hint of a return to the old order could again see them marginalized, a conviction which helped ensure the ruling party’s support has remained solid even as a corruption scandal swirled around it.

“Perhaps (they believe) AKP officials are corrupt,” wrote Barçın Yınanç, a columnist in the Hurriyet Daily News.

“But fear of being excluded, of being treated as underdogs … is greater than disappointment about the dirt in the AKP’s hands,” she said.

Here is the full story.


About yavuzbaydar

Yavuz Baydar has been an award-winning Turkish journalist, whose professional activity spans nearly four decades. In December 2013, Baydar co-founded the independent media platform, P24, Punto24, to monitor the media sector of Turkey, as well as organizing surveys, and training workshops. Baydar wrote opinion columns, in Turkish, liberal daily Ozgur Dusunce and news site Haberdar, and in English, daily Today's Zaman, on domestic and foreign policy issues related to Turkey, and media matters, until all had to cease publications due to growing political oppression. Currently, he writes regular chronicles for Die Süddeutsche Zeitung, and opinion columns for the Arab Weekly, as well as analysis for Index on Censorship. Baydar blogs with the Huffington Post, sharing his his analysis and views on Turkish politics, the Middle East, Balkans, Europe, U.S-Turkish relations, human rights, free speech, press freedom, history, etc. His opinion articles appeared at the New York Times, the Guardian, El Pais, Svenska Dagbladet, and Al Jazeera English online. Turkey’s first news ombudsman, beginning at Milliyet daily in 1999, Baydar worked in the same role as reader representative until 2014. His work included reader complaints with content, and commentary on media ethics. Working in a tough professional climate had its costs: he was twice forced to leave his job, after his self-critical columns on journalistic flaws and fabricated news stories. Baydar worked as producer and news presenter in Swedish Radio &TV Corp. (SR) Stockholm, Sweden between 1979-1991; as correspondent for Scandinavia and Baltics for Turkish daily Cumhuriyet between 1980-1992, and the BBC World Service, in early 1990's. Returning to Turkey in 1994, he worked as reporter and ediytor for various outlets in print, as well as hosting debate porogrammes in public and private TV channels. Baydar studied informatics, cybernetics and, later, had his journalism ediucatiob in the University of Stockholm. Baydar served as president of the U.S. based International Organizaton of News Ombudsmen (ONO) in 2003. He was a Knight-Wallace Fellow at University of Michigan in 2004. Baydar was given the Special Award of the European Press Prize (EPP), for 'excellence in journalism', along with the Guardian and Der Spiegel in 2014. He won the Umbria Journalism Award in March 2014 and Caravella/Mare Nostrum Prize in 2015; both in Italy. Baydar completed an extensive research on self-censorship, corruption in media, and growing threats over journalism in Turkey as a Shorenstein Fellow at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard.
This entry was posted in Turkey. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s