Journalist’s 52 years of prison risk for exposing state secrets prompts outcry

Journalists and politicians have criticized a jail sentence sought for journalist Mehmet Baransu who published classified documents from a 2004 National Security Council (MGK) meeting, saying that it has raised concerns about press freedom in Turkey.

“Lawsuits filed against Baransu and the prison term sought for him are unacceptable. It is a clear example of excess by our judiciary. A journalist is facing a lengthy prison term when he has done his duty of informing the public. This case clearly shows us that there’s no freedom of press or freedom of speech in Turkey,” Sibel Güneş, secretary general of the Turkish Journalists Association (TGC), told Today’s Zaman.

An İstanbul prosecutor is seeking 52 years in prison for Taraf daily columnist Mehmet Baransu for “exposing state secrets.” A rapid investigation launched against Baransu for publishing a confidential MGK document that mentioned a planned crackdown on faith-based groups — mainly the Hizmet movement, inspired by Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen — in the country has drawn condemnation and strong criticism.

The indictment, completed by the Anadolu Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, pointed out that Baransu’s report published on Nov. 28, 2013 in the Taraf daily exposed state secrets and thus requires severe punishment. Government officials did not deny the authenticity of the documents but argued that no action was taken to implement the policy prescriptions indicated therein.

Stressing that high-profile names from the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) confirmed the information published by Baransu, TGC’s Güneş said: “In this regard, the investigation launched against Baransu is baseless; it’s far from reality. We are calling on the government to lift the repression faced by the media.”

The prison term sought for Baransu is an intimidation against all journalists in Turkey, according to Orhan Kemal Cengiz, a lawyer and Today’s Zaman columnist. “More than 50 years in prison is sought for a journalist just because of what he reported; this is appalling. If he were a spy and had sold the information to another state, such a prison term would not be sought. This is terrifying with regard to freedom of speech,” he said. The prosecution of Baransu also violates the international conventions that Turkey is signatory to, Cengiz said, adding that publishing secret documents is a part of journalism.

“The main duty of a journalist is to publish documents that are newsworthy. There are some exceptions regarding hate speech and so on, but journalists can publish any documents they have obtained; maybe those who leak such documents can face prosecution. But if [prosecutors] ask journalists why they publish that information, they will criminalize journalistic activities. I regard this prosecution as an assault against journalism and a threat to all journalists,” he said.

Oktay Ekşi, a former journalist and an İstanbul deputy from the main opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP), said that a prison term sought for a journalist who published secret documents clearly shows Turkey’s low democratic standards.

“In properly functioning democracies where the rule of law is in place, journalists do not face prison terms when they publish information defined as state secrets, such as WikiLeaks documents or [National Security Association] NSA files obtained by Edward Snowden. In this sense, attempts to imprison a journalist who revealed a decision taken at a MGK meeting shows where Turkey is in the world regarding democracy and justice. The governing party has brought Turkey to this point, this is their shame,” Ekşi told Today’s Zaman.

Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) Ankara deputy Özcan Yeniçeri also slammed the jail sentence sought for Baransu, saying that all news reports criticizing the government are counted as criminal activity by the judiciary. “If there’s a crime, it can be prosecuted. But a 52-year prison term is an open intimidation. They say that revealing state secrets is a criminal activity. But let’s remember what pro-government journalists did during the Ergenekon and Balyoz trials; they published even more secret information. Is exposing secret information a criminal activity only for Baransu?” Yeniçeri told Today’s Zaman.

The prosecution of Baransu is designed to intimidate all journalists who might report the government’s wrongdoings, Yeniçeri added. “There’s no rule of law in Turkey anymore, there’s only the government’s law. This prosecution is an open intimidation designed to repress all publications critical of the government. Their main aim is to put limitations on the freedom of the press and freedom of speech,” he said.

Council of Media Ethics Chairman Halit Esendir, for his part, said that only those who leaked the secret documents can be prosecuted, not journalists.

“Any journalist who obtains such documents can publish them, even if they contain secret information. There are similar cases around the world, for example in the US. Publishing a secret document is not a criminal activity, and if leaking is an offense, then those who leaked are the ones who should be prosecuted,” Esendir said, adding that the lawsuit against Baransu is an open attack against press freedom.

Journalist Yavuz Baydar also finds the prosecution of Baransu unacceptable and against international conventions. Stressing that prosecution violates Article 90 of the Constitution which states that universal legal principles will be considered when domestic laws contradict universal law rulings, Baydar said: “Journalists are under the protection of Article 90 of the Constitution. This indictment violates Article 90. The state should find out who leaked the document, regardless of whether it is secret or not. But the state cannot stop the journalist doing his job, cannot threaten him and cannot put him into prison.”

Many journalists have lent their support to Baransu in messages on social media. Star daily columnist Mustafa Akyol wrote on his Twitter account: “In free countries, it cannot be an offense to ‘publish state secrets.’ I side with Baransu.”

BirGün daily columnist Can Dündar wrote: “A 52-year prison sentence has been sought for Baransu for ‘revealing information that should remain secret for the state’s benefit.’ What if the state’s advantage is our disadvantage?”

Posta daily columnist Nedim Şener wrote: “Seeking 52 years in prison for Mehmet Baransu is irrational and unacceptable. You cannot intimidate anybody. Publishing a document cannot be punished, otherwise somebody else will be punished as well.”

About yavuzbaydar

Yavuz Baydar 39 yıllık gazeteci. Mesleğe İsveç Radyosu'nda muhabir olarak başladı, oradan TV ve yazılı basına geçti. Sırasıyla Cumhuriyet İsveç muhabirliği, BBC Türkçe Servisi'nde yapımcı-sunuculuk, Yeni Yüzyıl'da dış haberler servis şefliği, Milliyet'te editörlük yaptı. 1999 yılı başında Milliyet Okur Temsilcisi olarak, medyada kurumsal bir 'özdenetim' yapısı olan ombudsmanlığı Türkiye'ye tanıtan ve ilk uygulayan kişi oldu. Bu görevi Milliyet ardından Sabah'ta da sürdürdü. Toplam 15 yıl süren bu görevi nedeniyle dünyanın en kıdemli ve 'uzman' ombudsmanlarından biri sayılıyor. Baydar, merkezi ABD'de bulunan Dünya Medya Ombudsmanları Örgütü'nde (ONO) başkanlık ve yürütme kurulu üyeliğini de üstlendi. Türkiye'ye döndüğü 1990'lı yılların ortasından bu yana çeşitli TV kanallarında başta Soru-Cevap olmak üzere çok sayıda analiz-tartışma programını hazırlayıp sunmuş olan Baydar, düzenli olarak Süddeutsche Zeitung ve The Arab Weekly için yorumlar yazmakta. Baydar, Ocak 2014'te bir grup meslektaşı ile beraber medya bağımsızlığı ve özgürlüğü alanında çalışmalar yürütmek üzere Bağımsız Gazetecilik Platformu'nun (P24) kurucu üyeleri arasında yer aldı. 2000 yılında 'Okur Temsilcisi' olarak yaptığı çalışmalar nedeniyle Çağdaş Gazeteciler Derneği'nin (ÇGD) Özel Ödülü'ne layık bulunan Baydar, 2014 yılında da, Avrupa'nın 'Pulitzer'i sayılan Avrupa Basın Ödülü'nü (EPP) 'meslekte mükemmeliyet' tanımlamasıyla aldı. 2004'te Michigan Üniversitesi'nde Knight-Wallace Araştırma Bursu ile 'Ortadoğu, demokrasi ve medya' konulu mesleki çalışmalar yapan Baydar, 2014 sonbaharında da Harvard Üniversitesi'ne bağlı Kennedy School'da 'Shorenstein Fellow' olarak Türkiye medyasında sansürün ve mali yozlaşmanın yayılmasını ele alan uzun bir rapor yayınladı. Baydar ayrıca Guardian, El Pais, New York Times gibi gazetelere de aralıklı olarak yorum ve analiz makaleleri yazıyor.
Bu yazı Uncategorized içinde yayınlandı. Kalıcı bağlantıyı yer imlerinize ekleyin.

Bir Cevap Yazın

Aşağıya bilgilerinizi girin veya oturum açmak için bir simgeye tıklayın:

WordPress.com Logosu

WordPress.com hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Twitter resmi

Twitter hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Facebook fotoğrafı

Facebook hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Google+ fotoğrafı

Google+ hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Connecting to %s