Misuse of taxpayers’ money problem in presidential campaign

Amid calls for the resignation of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan during his campaign for the presidency, experts have told Today’s Zaman that the most important issue is the possible misuse of taxpayers’ money and state funds, rather than resignation.

The law on presidential elections in Turkey — which was passed in 2012, following on from the change made in the way the president is elected in Turkey after the 2007 election — does not require the resignation of the prime minister if he or she runs for president, unlike for almost all other public officials. As a result, there is no legal problem preventing Erdoğan from running for president while remaining in his position. However, the opposition has claimed that there are ethical issues involved and concern over the use of state funds in the run-up to the election.

On Monday Erdoğan responded to criticism by mentioning examples from the Western world. He said neither US President Barack Obama nor German Chancellor Angela Merkel resigned from their public positions during their candidacy and that “there is no such custom” either at home or abroad.

Prominent political scientist Professor Ersin Kalaycıoğlu told Today’s Zaman on Tuesday that there are differences between the system in Turkey and those in Germany and the US. According to him, in a parliamentary system, the resignation of the prime minister when he or she runs again is not required. “The problem is the usage of state funds,” Kalaycıoğlu said, adding that in the Western world, there are unwritten ethical rules that oblige politicians to refrain from using public resources in their campaigns.

Kalaycıoğlu referred to the importance of the principle of fairness in elections and says that elections cannot be considered democratic if standards of fair play are not applied. In Turkey, Kalaycıoğlu said, public funds and resources are being spent in favor of one candidate, Prime Minister Erdoğan. “It does not matter if he resigns or not as long as he does not use taxpayers’ money,” Kalaycıoğlu asserted.

Ergun Özbudun, another prominent political scientist and a professor of constitutional law, says that there is no parallel between the current election race in Turkey and the previous elections in Germany and the US. “Merkel ran for re-election as chancellor,” he said, while Erdoğan wants to run for president while he is still prime minister. However, according to Özbudun, as long as public funds are not spent in the election campaign of Erdoğan, there would be no problem for him to remain in his position.

The discomfort over the use of public resources is not a concern specific to Turkey. In 2012, Republicans in the US filed a complaint with government investigators arguing that President Obama used the taxpayers’ money by traveling in Air Force One to swing states. They described Obama’s trip as “thinly veiled campaign events.”

In response, the White House said that the trips were part of the official responsibility of the president. Political trips are defined in the US as travel to a destination not as commander-in-chief but as de facto leader of a political party for fundraisers, campaign rallies or party events. Despite that definition, “gray areas” remain in the American system as well. “When they [the president and vice president] travel and appear in public to defend their policy positions, the difference between their official duties and their activities as leaders of their political party can be difficult to assess,” the Congressional Research Service reported in 2007.

Similarly, Erdoğan has been criticized for using the private jet “Ana” which is allocated for the president and the prime minister in Turkey. However, unlike in the US, politicians in Turkey are not asked to reimburse taxpayers for their political trips. One recent exception was President Abdullah Gül’s trip to Boston in May when he attended his son’s graduation ceremony. Gül declared that it was a private trip and he met the expenses.

Main opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP) Bursa deputy Aykan Erdemir, who used to be an academic at Harvard University, says that the systems in the US and Turkey are not comparable since in Turkey, Erdoğan is trying to switch from the Prime Ministry to the Presidency while still in office. However, in the US or in Germany, the politicians Erdoğan referred to were candidates who ran again for the same position in the executive branch.

Calling the current presidential race “unfair,” Erdemir says that taxpayers’ money is being spent on the personal career of a politician, Prime Minister Erdoğan. According to Erdemir, a long-term solution to the problem lies in a far-reaching law on campaign financing in Turkey. He adds that in addition to laws and watchdogs, the ethical principles of politicians are also determinant in conducting a fair campaign. He says the problem in Turkey is “systemic” since the usage of public funds has not been carefully regulated. Erdemir argues that the abuse of public funds is not restricted to this election campaign, but is a longstanding problem. 

About yavuzbaydar

Yavuz Baydar 39 yıllık gazeteci. Mesleğe İsveç Radyosu'nda muhabir olarak başladı, oradan TV ve yazılı basına geçti. Sırasıyla Cumhuriyet İsveç muhabirliği, BBC Türkçe Servisi'nde yapımcı-sunuculuk, Yeni Yüzyıl'da dış haberler servis şefliği, Milliyet'te editörlük yaptı. 1999 yılı başında Milliyet Okur Temsilcisi olarak, medyada kurumsal bir 'özdenetim' yapısı olan ombudsmanlığı Türkiye'ye tanıtan ve ilk uygulayan kişi oldu. Bu görevi Milliyet ardından Sabah'ta da sürdürdü. Toplam 15 yıl süren bu görevi nedeniyle dünyanın en kıdemli ve 'uzman' ombudsmanlarından biri sayılıyor. Baydar, merkezi ABD'de bulunan Dünya Medya Ombudsmanları Örgütü'nde (ONO) başkanlık ve yürütme kurulu üyeliğini de üstlendi. Türkiye'ye döndüğü 1990'lı yılların ortasından bu yana çeşitli TV kanallarında başta Soru-Cevap olmak üzere çok sayıda analiz-tartışma programını hazırlayıp sunmuş olan Baydar, düzenli olarak Süddeutsche Zeitung ve The Arab Weekly için yorumlar yazmakta. Baydar, Ocak 2014'te bir grup meslektaşı ile beraber medya bağımsızlığı ve özgürlüğü alanında çalışmalar yürütmek üzere Bağımsız Gazetecilik Platformu'nun (P24) kurucu üyeleri arasında yer aldı. 2000 yılında 'Okur Temsilcisi' olarak yaptığı çalışmalar nedeniyle Çağdaş Gazeteciler Derneği'nin (ÇGD) Özel Ödülü'ne layık bulunan Baydar, 2014 yılında da, Avrupa'nın 'Pulitzer'i sayılan Avrupa Basın Ödülü'nü (EPP) 'meslekte mükemmeliyet' tanımlamasıyla aldı. 2004'te Michigan Üniversitesi'nde Knight-Wallace Araştırma Bursu ile 'Ortadoğu, demokrasi ve medya' konulu mesleki çalışmalar yapan Baydar, 2014 sonbaharında da Harvard Üniversitesi'ne bağlı Kennedy School'da 'Shorenstein Fellow' olarak Türkiye medyasında sansürün ve mali yozlaşmanın yayılmasını ele alan uzun bir rapor yayınladı. Baydar ayrıca Guardian, El Pais, New York Times gibi gazetelere de aralıklı olarak yorum ve analiz makaleleri yazıyor.
Bu yazı Uncategorized içinde yayınlandı. Kalıcı bağlantıyı yer imlerinize ekleyin.

Bir Cevap Yazın

Aşağıya bilgilerinizi girin veya oturum açmak için bir simgeye tıklayın:

WordPress.com Logosu

WordPress.com hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Twitter resmi

Twitter hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Facebook fotoğrafı

Facebook hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Google+ fotoğrafı

Google+ hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Connecting to %s