Turkey’s destructive ’House of Cards’ on full display

The so-called “game-changer” in Syria is now more or less clear in details. With a change of heart in Ankara, İncirlik Air Base — which is about 300 kilometers to the nearest Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) targets — will be operational and a “de-facto safe zone” will eventually be established inside Syrian territory, at the Turkish border.

“The agreement includes a plan to drive the Islamic State out of a 68-mile-long area west of the Euphrates River and reaching into the province of Aleppo that would then come under the control of the Syrian opposition,” the Washington Post reported.

When implemented, the “safe zone” will pose huge challenges, but let’s leave them for analysis later on. There are at the moment far more urgent and important issues at stake, as we observe this apparently flawed “game-changer” taking place.

However much ill-thought this may have been, it will have to be tested as it stands to be instrumentalized by President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, whose aspirations to cling to power are being challenged at home.

As Patrick Cockburn in the UK Independent noted:

”… whatever America was hoping for, initial signs are that the Turkish government may be more interested in moving against the Kurds in Turkey, Syria and Iraq than it is in attacking ISIS [ISIL] … Meanwhile, Turkish police have stepped up suppression of all types of dissent — using water cannon against everybody from activists to members of the heterodox Shia Alevi sect, who number several million and claim they are discriminated against.

”The result is that the US may find it has helped to destabilize Turkey by involving it in the war in both Iraq and Syria, yet without coming much closer to defeating ISIS in either country. If so, America will have committed its biggest mistake in the Middle East since it invaded Iraq in 2003, believing it could overthrow Saddam Hussein and replace him with a pro-American government.”

Any clear-cut decision to join the international battle against ISIL would have been welcome by the entire opposition and larger parts of the society in Turkey.

But it is not. On the home front, the deliberate “blur” of double wars — against the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) and ISIL — and the termination of a three-year long cease-fire with the Kurdish rebels — in a disproportionate response — by the “caretaker” Justice and Development Party (AKP) government without any consultations in the newly elected Parliament, has raised the domestic tension to new heights.

The leader of the Republican People’s Party (CHP), Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, said that “Erdoğan is gambling on Turkey’s future,” while Selahattin Demirtaş, co-chairman of pro-Kurdish Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP) told the press that “Erdoğan is dragging Turkey into a war.”

In an apparent display of a Turkish-style “House of Cards,” Erdoğan seems determined to pave the way for a new election, to discredit Demirtaş and to force the tactical votes to flee from the HDP, so that it fails to pass the 10 threshold, and a three-party Parliament that can secure him, at best, a path to a presidential system or, at worst, extend his shaken power.

In his “House of Cards” strategy, Erdoğan identified the need for two key elements to claim legitimacy.

On the international level, he needed to be “seen” as part of the coalition against ISIL, which after the latest agreement, seems, at least before the eyes of Barack Obama, to be achieved. At home, by blending in the war against the PKK, he not only appeases the inherent Kurdish allergy towards the military, but also opens the gates for the new polls, hoping to embrace enough nationalist votes to reinject the strength he had lost.

Does Obama even realize the immense risk that such calculations may drag Turkey into a swamp of violence? I have my strong doubts.

Abandoning the peace process and opening the ground for endless provocations at this stage promises only vendetta and bloodshed.

Let me end with the June 7 election results in the 12 mainly Kurdish provinces of Turkey, where the HDP emerged as the first party:

Kars (44 percent), Mardin (73.26), Şırnak (85.36), Hakkari (86.4), Diyarbakır (79.06), Batman (72.58), Siirt (65.81), Van (74.82), Muş (71.32), Bitlis (60.36), Ağrı (78.22) and Tunceli (60.91).

To read the full column, click here.

Advertisements

About yavuzbaydar

Yavuz Baydar has been an award-winning Turkish journalist, whose professional activity spans nearly four decades. In December 2013, Baydar co-founded the independent media platform, P24, Punto24, to monitor the media sector of Turkey, as well as organizing surveys, and training workshops. Baydar wrote opinion columns, in Turkish, liberal daily Ozgur Dusunce and news site Haberdar, and in English, daily Today's Zaman, on domestic and foreign policy issues related to Turkey, and media matters, until all had to cease publications due to growing political oppression. Currently, he writes regular chronicles for Die Süddeutsche Zeitung, and opinion columns for the Arab Weekly, as well as analysis for Index on Censorship. Baydar blogs with the Huffington Post, sharing his his analysis and views on Turkish politics, the Middle East, Balkans, Europe, U.S-Turkish relations, human rights, free speech, press freedom, history, etc. His opinion articles appeared at the New York Times, the Guardian, El Pais, Svenska Dagbladet, and Al Jazeera English online. Turkey’s first news ombudsman, beginning at Milliyet daily in 1999, Baydar worked in the same role as reader representative until 2014. His work included reader complaints with content, and commentary on media ethics. Working in a tough professional climate had its costs: he was twice forced to leave his job, after his self-critical columns on journalistic flaws and fabricated news stories. Baydar worked as producer and news presenter in Swedish Radio &TV Corp. (SR) Stockholm, Sweden between 1979-1991; as correspondent for Scandinavia and Baltics for Turkish daily Cumhuriyet between 1980-1992, and the BBC World Service, in early 1990's. Returning to Turkey in 1994, he worked as reporter and ediytor for various outlets in print, as well as hosting debate porogrammes in public and private TV channels. Baydar studied informatics, cybernetics and, later, had his journalism ediucatiob in the University of Stockholm. Baydar served as president of the U.S. based International Organizaton of News Ombudsmen (ONO) in 2003. He was a Knight-Wallace Fellow at University of Michigan in 2004. Baydar was given the Special Award of the European Press Prize (EPP), for 'excellence in journalism', along with the Guardian and Der Spiegel in 2014. He won the Umbria Journalism Award in March 2014 and Caravella/Mare Nostrum Prize in 2015; both in Italy. Baydar completed an extensive research on self-censorship, corruption in media, and growing threats over journalism in Turkey as a Shorenstein Fellow at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard.
This entry was posted in Turkey. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s