Turkish deal with the U.S. on ISIS has added only fuel to destabilisation in Turkey

In an article titled “Regional powers are making a mess of the Middle East” (Al Jazeera America, Aug. 10), Rami Khouri, a renowned analyst (and a senior fellow at Harvard Kennedy School), argued:

“We have entered a wild new era in which actors within the region are driving new ideological tensions, civil conflicts and regional wars.”

“Now when Saudis, Iranians, Turks and Egyptians fight, they do so to pursue their own goals rather than be proxy responders to superpowers’ wishes. This is a paradigm shift, and we should expect much greater destruction, longer wars, a trail of shattered lands and ungoverned terrain, with terror groups such as Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) taking root.”

”At least a dozen regional players — both states and nonstate actors — routinely stir the pot in the area, starting with local powers Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Iran (and its allied Shia militias in Iraq) and Hezbollah. Add Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, a resurgent Egypt and assorted Kurdish groups to the mix; aggravate tensions by introducing ISIL and the Ansarullah group (Houthis) in Yemen; and you are left with a veritable mess of powers vying for regional influence. And that’s without even counting the hundreds of local militias and political and tribal groups that operate in and across many countries.”

And, taking the examples of Egypt and Saudi Arabia, flexing more and more muscle, he concluded, that “Regional powers decide to go to war, the superpowers support them…”

Its own particularities aside, Turkey has a befitting part in this picture.

In his column in Today’s Zaman daily, Gökhan Bacık wrote that ”when it comes to Turkish foreign policy we are in the age of ‘nobody knows the truth.’”

I am sure, as far it goes, that “the truth” we know about is that, lacking any strategy, Turkish foreign policy is a combination of domestic-oriented tactics and reflexes borne out of a crystallizing convergence between Justice and Development Party (AKP) Islamism and persistent nationalism represented by the military and the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP).

What the current conjuncture offers regarding Turkey’s double warfare spreading across its borders is certainly a powerful example of what Khouri calls “making a regional mess.” It is the reason why, on a micro level, the recent interview with Cemil Bayık, a leading figure of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), in The Daily Telegraph, falls into this picture.

We know that in the growing mess of Turkey, an immediate and unilateral cease-fire by the PKK should be the utmost priority. We also know that President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, tightly squeezed into a corner, is determined to instrumentalize the continuity of violence.

If the US-Turkish agreement is to be a “game-changer” for the US-led coalition to take the lead, serious efforts must be staged by intermediaries to break the spiral, because the instrumentalization of bloodbaths and destruction needs a counter “game-changer.”

Bayık’s confirmation of contacts between US officials and the PKK comes, therefore, as an important signal.

“Of course there are messages, there are meetings, letters and they are likely to develop more,” he said. “I repeat my call that the US mediate in this situation between us and Turkey, and if they give us a guarantee we accept that role. Unless there are guarantees we cannot make unilateral steps.”

“If America continues to back Turkey’s policies it is possible it will lose the Kurds,” he said. “If America loses the Kurds, it will be difficult to defeat ISIS [Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL)].

A key point to be made here is that what should be of concern is not Turkey’s lack of strategy, but the half-hearted engagement and incomplete American strategy on Syria.

As the editorial in the Observer on Saturday noted:

”Turkey’s principal preoccupation seems to be neither [Syrian President Bashar al-] Assad, nor Isis. Erdogan hopes a new poll, after weeks of fighting the Kurds, will draw the support of nationalists attracted by the anti-terror narrative and splinter the HDP. Only then, with a restored majority, would Erdogan turn his attention to a groundswell that could define the region’s very future. The danger is that the increasingly mercurial Turkish leader is in danger of pursuing his own political and national interests at the expense of the search for a wider regional settlement that could at last offer peace to the region.”

About yavuzbaydar

Yavuz Baydar has been an award-winning Turkish journalist, whose professional activity spans nearly four decades. In December 2013, Baydar co-founded the independent media platform, P24, Punto24, to monitor the media sector of Turkey, as well as organizing surveys, and training workshops. Baydar wrote opinion columns, in Turkish, liberal daily Ozgur Dusunce and news site Haberdar, and in English, daily Today's Zaman, on domestic and foreign policy issues related to Turkey, and media matters, until all had to cease publications due to growing political oppression. Currently, he writes regular chronicles for Die Süddeutsche Zeitung, and opinion columns for the Arab Weekly, as well as analysis for Index on Censorship. Baydar blogs with the Huffington Post, sharing his his analysis and views on Turkish politics, the Middle East, Balkans, Europe, U.S-Turkish relations, human rights, free speech, press freedom, history, etc. His opinion articles appeared at the New York Times, the Guardian, El Pais, Svenska Dagbladet, and Al Jazeera English online. Turkey’s first news ombudsman, beginning at Milliyet daily in 1999, Baydar worked in the same role as reader representative until 2014. His work included reader complaints with content, and commentary on media ethics. Working in a tough professional climate had its costs: he was twice forced to leave his job, after his self-critical columns on journalistic flaws and fabricated news stories. Baydar worked as producer and news presenter in Swedish Radio &TV Corp. (SR) Stockholm, Sweden between 1979-1991; as correspondent for Scandinavia and Baltics for Turkish daily Cumhuriyet between 1980-1992, and the BBC World Service, in early 1990's. Returning to Turkey in 1994, he worked as reporter and ediytor for various outlets in print, as well as hosting debate porogrammes in public and private TV channels. Baydar studied informatics, cybernetics and, later, had his journalism ediucatiob in the University of Stockholm. Baydar served as president of the U.S. based International Organizaton of News Ombudsmen (ONO) in 2003. He was a Knight-Wallace Fellow at University of Michigan in 2004. Baydar was given the Special Award of the European Press Prize (EPP), for 'excellence in journalism', along with the Guardian and Der Spiegel in 2014. He won the Umbria Journalism Award in March 2014 and Caravella/Mare Nostrum Prize in 2015; both in Italy. Baydar completed an extensive research on self-censorship, corruption in media, and growing threats over journalism in Turkey as a Shorenstein Fellow at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard.
This entry was posted in Turkey. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Turkish deal with the U.S. on ISIS has added only fuel to destabilisation in Turkey

  1. am very unhappy days I ‘ve THIS COUNTRY

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s