Turkey towards Emergency Rule, escorted by its ‘Genetically Modified Media’

Signs of a merge between militarist nationalism and corrupt political Islam become stronger every day.

If true, Turkey faces its most destructive counter-force and a final test of the resilience of its already shaken and rattled parliamentary system.

With its key state institutions dangerously locked out of functioning and only a single person holding the keys to everything, what emerges out of the current turmoil is the design of a rule based primarily on security concerns and full-scale control of the dissenting parts of the civil society. Behind this move lies, certainly, an overwhelming desire of the single ruler to cling to power, no matter what.

This raises questions about how “operational,” in terms of security and oppression, the current interim government sees itself. Some of the concerns seemed verified when Selami Altınok, minister of interior affairs — with a background in the police — commented on the clashes and killings in the mainly Kurdish southeastern provinces.

“We will be resolute to the very end in our fight against terror,” he said. “We shall not allow an uprising against the Turkish state and its nation. Whenever necessary, we shall very ruthlessly crush their skulls.”

Far more important confirmation about the authoritarianism has been found in a story, published yesterday by the independent Cumhuriyet daily, titled “We are all being watched.” The daily reported that Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu sent a directive, which Cumhuriyet describes as a “de-facto emergency rule declaration” to the governors of Turkey’s 81 provinces on Aug. 12.

The directive informs that a “Coordination Center of the Prime Ministry” was established in Ankara with subordinate structures in each province. It entitles the police, gendarmerie, national intelligence and prosecutors to engage in mass profiling of citizens and observe the activities of NGOs, platforms, local press, web portals and social media accounts — with weekly reports to Ankara.

This follows President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s call for elected district headmen to act as informers and the authorities promising a price for all those who report suspicions on criminal activities.

Needless to say, these signs are wrapped up in a dense nationalist, revanchist official rhetoric and delivered in harsh statements.

When we put the latest developments of the crackdown on media into this context, the picture becomes even clearer. Up until the detention of three British journalists from Vice News, foreign media operated freely — compared to many other countries in the region — in whatever it desired to cover. No longer. The detention of these colleagues signals a return to the conditions of the 1990s, where harassment, restrictions and even deportations from the mainly Kurdish areas were routine.

Regarding the crippling of the domestic media, the measures of force are also intensifying. The police raid on the headquarters of Koza İpek Holding and its media outlets is a blazing example of the attempts to silence whatever remains of Turkey’s free and independent media, especially its efficient TV channels.

The accusations are outrageous. The search order is filled with blurred presumptions and its main suspicion that the group aiding and abetting a terror organization — about which there is not an indictment or a case — is simply a farce.

Çiğdem Toker, a top investigative reporter from Cumhuriyet, put it best when she summarized the rationale behind the Koza İpek raid:

“Say I am the owner of a foundation. One day I notice in my bank account a huge amount of money, which I wasn’t expecting at all. The money was sent to me by an internationally reputed industrial holding. Then, after investigating, I realize that this company was supposed to send it to a sister company and that the bank made a technical mistake due to glitches in its system. Later correspondence also confirms that the mistake stems from the bank. However, my house is raided after all… I am told that ‘we are not convinced by the bank that it made a mistake, so we decided to search your home because there is a possibility that due to this bank transfer you may have financed terrorist activity.’

As ridiculous as that.

This is the “stick” side of the dealings with the media. On the “carrot” side, the most recent news is that Europe’s second largest oil company, Total, sold its retail network to Demirören Group, which owns dailies Milliyet and Vatan, for 325 million euros.

The Demirören family has been busy these days firing a number of critical journalists and columnists such as Mehveş Evin, Meral Tamer and Kemal Göktaş from its outlets. This is the same proprietor who was reported to have burst into tears when Erdoğan gave him an earbashing over the phone about Milliyet’s scoop about a Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) story. This episode was followed by the dismissals of a number of respected journalists two years ago.

Make no mistake about it:

A “genetically modified media” is in the making, in order to lead the way for Turkish authoritarianism, now a merge of militarist nationalism and corrupt political Islam, to be established, for good.

The days of Turkey’s democracy, it seems, are numbered.

About yavuzbaydar

Yavuz Baydar 39 yıllık gazeteci. Mesleğe İsveç Radyosu'nda muhabir olarak başladı, oradan TV ve yazılı basına geçti. Sırasıyla Cumhuriyet İsveç muhabirliği, BBC Türkçe Servisi'nde yapımcı-sunuculuk, Yeni Yüzyıl'da dış haberler servis şefliği, Milliyet'te editörlük yaptı. 1999 yılı başında Milliyet Okur Temsilcisi olarak, medyada kurumsal bir 'özdenetim' yapısı olan ombudsmanlığı Türkiye'ye tanıtan ve ilk uygulayan kişi oldu. Bu görevi Milliyet ardından Sabah'ta da sürdürdü. Toplam 15 yıl süren bu görevi nedeniyle dünyanın en kıdemli ve 'uzman' ombudsmanlarından biri sayılıyor. Baydar, merkezi ABD'de bulunan Dünya Medya Ombudsmanları Örgütü'nde (ONO) başkanlık ve yürütme kurulu üyeliğini de üstlendi. Türkiye'ye döndüğü 1990'lı yılların ortasından bu yana çeşitli TV kanallarında başta Soru-Cevap olmak üzere çok sayıda analiz-tartışma programını hazırlayıp sunmuş olan Baydar, düzenli olarak Süddeutsche Zeitung ve The Arab Weekly için yorumlar yazmakta. Baydar, Ocak 2014'te bir grup meslektaşı ile beraber medya bağımsızlığı ve özgürlüğü alanında çalışmalar yürütmek üzere Bağımsız Gazetecilik Platformu'nun (P24) kurucu üyeleri arasında yer aldı. 2000 yılında 'Okur Temsilcisi' olarak yaptığı çalışmalar nedeniyle Çağdaş Gazeteciler Derneği'nin (ÇGD) Özel Ödülü'ne layık bulunan Baydar, 2014 yılında da, Avrupa'nın 'Pulitzer'i sayılan Avrupa Basın Ödülü'nü (EPP) 'meslekte mükemmeliyet' tanımlamasıyla aldı. 2004'te Michigan Üniversitesi'nde Knight-Wallace Araştırma Bursu ile 'Ortadoğu, demokrasi ve medya' konulu mesleki çalışmalar yapan Baydar, 2014 sonbaharında da Harvard Üniversitesi'ne bağlı Kennedy School'da 'Shorenstein Fellow' olarak Türkiye medyasında sansürün ve mali yozlaşmanın yayılmasını ele alan uzun bir rapor yayınladı. Baydar ayrıca Guardian, El Pais, New York Times gibi gazetelere de aralıklı olarak yorum ve analiz makaleleri yazıyor.
Bu yazı AKP, Media, Turkey içinde yayınlandı ve , , olarak etiketlendi. Kalıcı bağlantıyı yer imlerinize ekleyin.

Bir Cevap Yazın

Aşağıya bilgilerinizi girin veya oturum açmak için bir simgeye tıklayın:

WordPress.com Logosu

WordPress.com hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Twitter resmi

Twitter hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Facebook fotoğrafı

Facebook hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Google+ fotoğrafı

Google+ hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Connecting to %s