’Refugee-phobia’ lays ground for the selfish EU to be duped into abandoning democratic values

To understand, first, the gravity of the developing story in Turkish politics, let’s have a look at the spot-on wrap up by David Gardner in Tuesday’s edition of the Financial Times:

“Since his ascent to the presidency in August last year, Mr [Recep Tayyip] Erdoğan has continued to expand his power at the expense of the rule of law and basic freedoms of expression and assembly. The president is issuing writs for defamation like confetti.

“With [Justice and Development Party] AKP-incited mobs attacking [Peoples’ Democratic Party] HDP party offices and independent media operations, and daily xenophobic outpourings against the international conspiracy supposedly out to get Mr Erdoğan, the military he had defanged is edging back into the circle of power. Army commanders… have been handed effective control of a dozen southeastern provinces. ‘Because of Erdoğan’s intoxication with power we lost the opportunity to democratize this country under civilian rule,’ says one leading analyst.”

Against this background, the HDP’s departure from the already problematic interim government was only a matter of time. It happened on Tuesday when two ministers from the pro-Kurdish party, the minister of the EU and the minister of development, arranged a hasty press conference (which was totally censored by the so-called ‘mainstream’ media) and declared that the path to the polls were under full control of the “palace” — referring to President Erdoğan and his team. They repeated “we shall not allow you to have executive presidential powers” and walked out.

When the political situation in Turkey deteriorates day after day, tumbling into an “ungovernable state,” its president is fully determined to engage all in his reach to instrumentalize in his personal favor.

Domestically, he successfully managed to carve a divide between the three main opposition parties, using the timidity of the main opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP) on the Kurdish issue, and the fierce hostility of the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) towards the HDP. Riding on the divided opposition, the media and large swaths of the electorate, the pressure on dissenting voices mounts with every passing day, as the civil society remains unwilling or unable to unite on the most basic common denominator over human rights. This sort of national confusion perfectly serves all the ambitions for a shift towards fascism.

Internationally, the conditions also seem ripe for the Erdoğan team’s manipulations. When the deal over the Incirlik Air Base was sealed, and the written objectives pointed to a joint battle against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), Turkey’s allies were to a large extent shocked to instead see a wide front opening against the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), one of the key allies of the People’s Protection Units (YPG) militia fighting on the ground against ISIL.

This has led many independent columnists and media outlets to criticize the White House for letting itself be thoroughly duped by Ankara. This issue is now slowly building up to a nasty conflict between Turkey and the US, adding problems rather than helping to prepare solutions.

Now, another critical moment — wide open to abuse — is approaching.

It has to do with containing the Syrian refugee problem within the borders of Turkey.

It was reported on Monday that “EU officials hope the emergency summit on Wednesday” will deliver concrete pledges of support for Turkey and other nations housing some 4 million Syrian refugees, as well as for the 11 million Syrians now homeless inside their own country. The European Commission had said it was ready to come up with an estimated 1 billion euros for Turkey, more than five times what the EU has already mobilized for the 2 million refugees there…

It is clear that some of the EU members — particularly those in Central and Eastern Europe, whose democratic mindset is still immature — see the Syrian refugee influx as a burden to be shuffled over to Turkey. Their selfish sense of urgency raises doubts among Turkey’s already pressurized reform circles that in what may be seen by Ankara as a perfect negotiating moment to consolidate authoritarianism.

It may be in the EU’s short-term interests to keep the refugee crisis limited to Turkey, but if it is not put in the context of long-term interests — which is a democratically stable Turkey — we are doomed to see deeper troubles ahead.

About yavuzbaydar

Yavuz Baydar 39 yıllık gazeteci. Mesleğe İsveç Radyosu'nda muhabir olarak başladı, oradan TV ve yazılı basına geçti. Sırasıyla Cumhuriyet İsveç muhabirliği, BBC Türkçe Servisi'nde yapımcı-sunuculuk, Yeni Yüzyıl'da dış haberler servis şefliği, Milliyet'te editörlük yaptı. 1999 yılı başında Milliyet Okur Temsilcisi olarak, medyada kurumsal bir 'özdenetim' yapısı olan ombudsmanlığı Türkiye'ye tanıtan ve ilk uygulayan kişi oldu. Bu görevi Milliyet ardından Sabah'ta da sürdürdü. Toplam 15 yıl süren bu görevi nedeniyle dünyanın en kıdemli ve 'uzman' ombudsmanlarından biri sayılıyor. Baydar, merkezi ABD'de bulunan Dünya Medya Ombudsmanları Örgütü'nde (ONO) başkanlık ve yürütme kurulu üyeliğini de üstlendi. Türkiye'ye döndüğü 1990'lı yılların ortasından bu yana çeşitli TV kanallarında başta Soru-Cevap olmak üzere çok sayıda analiz-tartışma programını hazırlayıp sunmuş olan Baydar, düzenli olarak Süddeutsche Zeitung ve The Arab Weekly için yorumlar yazmakta. Baydar, Ocak 2014'te bir grup meslektaşı ile beraber medya bağımsızlığı ve özgürlüğü alanında çalışmalar yürütmek üzere Bağımsız Gazetecilik Platformu'nun (P24) kurucu üyeleri arasında yer aldı. 2000 yılında 'Okur Temsilcisi' olarak yaptığı çalışmalar nedeniyle Çağdaş Gazeteciler Derneği'nin (ÇGD) Özel Ödülü'ne layık bulunan Baydar, 2014 yılında da, Avrupa'nın 'Pulitzer'i sayılan Avrupa Basın Ödülü'nü (EPP) 'meslekte mükemmeliyet' tanımlamasıyla aldı. 2004'te Michigan Üniversitesi'nde Knight-Wallace Araştırma Bursu ile 'Ortadoğu, demokrasi ve medya' konulu mesleki çalışmalar yapan Baydar, 2014 sonbaharında da Harvard Üniversitesi'ne bağlı Kennedy School'da 'Shorenstein Fellow' olarak Türkiye medyasında sansürün ve mali yozlaşmanın yayılmasını ele alan uzun bir rapor yayınladı. Baydar ayrıca Guardian, El Pais, New York Times gibi gazetelere de aralıklı olarak yorum ve analiz makaleleri yazıyor.
Bu yazı Uncategorized içinde yayınlandı. Kalıcı bağlantıyı yer imlerinize ekleyin.

Bir Cevap Yazın

Aşağıya bilgilerinizi girin veya oturum açmak için bir simgeye tıklayın:

WordPress.com Logosu

WordPress.com hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Twitter resmi

Twitter hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Facebook fotoğrafı

Facebook hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Google+ fotoğrafı

Google+ hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Connecting to %s