To a man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail

Here is a translation of my column – for daily Bugün – published yesterday:


At first glance, the ‘overall picture’ shows: firmly convinced that he commands the key positions of the state, the new hegemon has totally adopted the security reflexes of his predecessor; the old epauletted hegemon.

The hammer, which must have been cast aside for good, has just changed hands.

The new owner of the hammer sees every ongoing problem, all of which he came to power to solve, as a nail.

When rapes and murders of women surge, the first thing coming to their mind is castration and death penalty. That is exactly what reflex is. When you don’t have a capacity for soul-searching, or the virtue to ask ‘Is it our fault?’, those measures that can only aggravate problems seem more useful, easier and more comfortable to you.

That freak of a bill named Domestic Security Package also evokes the same hammer-nail simile at first glance.

Despite all prudent appeals, ‘don’t do it’ warnings by bar associations, despite outcries like ‘Don’t give us a new state of emergency nightmare’, despite lawyers taking to the streets en masse, that freak of a bill, which is by no stretch of the imagination consistent and is going to wipe out Turkey’s democracy target, was finally brought to Parliament with the insistence ‘it will be passed into law in any case.’

What does this insistence, this panic mood, this headstrong attitude and course aim at? Why has the AKP’s ‘liberalism’, which subsequently turned out to be apparently deceitful, misleading andinsincere, given way to security obsession?

It’s simple!

The police state project, whose construction accelerated, is intended to secure the autocracy of the current government (at least) until 2023, by ‘criminalizing’ the entire opposition. The project proceeds through reconsidering death penalty, through arbitrary detention and wiretapping, considering marbles as weapon, giving police broader authority to use their weapons and sending young people to jail by regarding even the softest criticism and opposition as ‘insult.’

What’s intended is to ensure the fortification of that ugly concrete power structure, which they try to sell as New Turkey by feeding people mythological discourses, against every kind ofdemocratic challenge.

The project called peace process also fits the same shoddy mould. The most important objective in the short term is the supposed ‘security’ of the elections.

Those saying that things seem dire will be intimidated into silence. Whoever takes to the streets – be it men, women, children – will be beaten and jailed.

A religious section of society that is worried but displaying passive resistance will be penetrated, to the accompaniment of ‘parallel’ ravings.

While discordant sounds of lie manufacturers resound, the universal principle ‘innocence is assumed until guilt is conclusively established’ will be trampled on with the rebuke ‘get off!’ and lives will be made miserable. They will thus sow discord among believers.

‘Deliberation of deliberations’ will be held with more ‘formidable’ ones, to ensure no road accident occurs on the eve of the elections.

The rest will be figured out later. Just wait till we cross the last bridge. Those acting as if they were smart calculate this.

Will it go well? I’m not sure at all.

The smouldering cauldron called AKP began to give out bubbles. Many signs have appeared and are piling up there.

Most importantly, women took to the streets.

If the lethargic opposition was wise, that would be a force to be reckoned with.

Safety of women is one of the most crucial issues in this country. Whoever wins women over will be likely to come to power.

Another important development is on the side of ‘Kurdish Political Movement.’ The peace process undermines Öcalan’s authority. Kandil [PKK’s leadership] sees the ‘deliberation of deliberation’ as an apparent ruse due to the lack of a constitutional-legal basis.

Ignorance on the side of the AKP and its supporters is so great that they think they can attain their goal by driving a wedge between Öcalan and the Union of Kurdish Communities (KCK).
It’s sheer blindness.

No one is convinced that the People’s Democratic Party (HDP) can pass the freak of the 10-percent election threshold, either. Even the question ‘How and where can the HDP find observers for 167,000 ballot boxes?’ is not answered yet.

In short, we are in dangerous waters.

The trouble is that if the AKP’s ramshackle plan fails, the whole society will pay the bill with people further falling out with each other.

About yavuzbaydar

Yavuz Baydar 39 yıllık gazeteci. Mesleğe İsveç Radyosu'nda muhabir olarak başladı, oradan TV ve yazılı basına geçti. Sırasıyla Cumhuriyet İsveç muhabirliği, BBC Türkçe Servisi'nde yapımcı-sunuculuk, Yeni Yüzyıl'da dış haberler servis şefliği, Milliyet'te editörlük yaptı. 1999 yılı başında Milliyet Okur Temsilcisi olarak, medyada kurumsal bir 'özdenetim' yapısı olan ombudsmanlığı Türkiye'ye tanıtan ve ilk uygulayan kişi oldu. Bu görevi Milliyet ardından Sabah'ta da sürdürdü. Toplam 15 yıl süren bu görevi nedeniyle dünyanın en kıdemli ve 'uzman' ombudsmanlarından biri sayılıyor. Baydar, merkezi ABD'de bulunan Dünya Medya Ombudsmanları Örgütü'nde (ONO) başkanlık ve yürütme kurulu üyeliğini de üstlendi. Türkiye'ye döndüğü 1990'lı yılların ortasından bu yana çeşitli TV kanallarında başta Soru-Cevap olmak üzere çok sayıda analiz-tartışma programını hazırlayıp sunmuş olan Baydar, düzenli olarak Süddeutsche Zeitung ve The Arab Weekly için yorumlar yazmakta. Baydar, Ocak 2014'te bir grup meslektaşı ile beraber medya bağımsızlığı ve özgürlüğü alanında çalışmalar yürütmek üzere Bağımsız Gazetecilik Platformu'nun (P24) kurucu üyeleri arasında yer aldı. 2000 yılında 'Okur Temsilcisi' olarak yaptığı çalışmalar nedeniyle Çağdaş Gazeteciler Derneği'nin (ÇGD) Özel Ödülü'ne layık bulunan Baydar, 2014 yılında da, Avrupa'nın 'Pulitzer'i sayılan Avrupa Basın Ödülü'nü (EPP) 'meslekte mükemmeliyet' tanımlamasıyla aldı. 2004'te Michigan Üniversitesi'nde Knight-Wallace Araştırma Bursu ile 'Ortadoğu, demokrasi ve medya' konulu mesleki çalışmalar yapan Baydar, 2014 sonbaharında da Harvard Üniversitesi'ne bağlı Kennedy School'da 'Shorenstein Fellow' olarak Türkiye medyasında sansürün ve mali yozlaşmanın yayılmasını ele alan uzun bir rapor yayınladı. Baydar ayrıca Guardian, El Pais, New York Times gibi gazetelere de aralıklı olarak yorum ve analiz makaleleri yazıyor.
Bu yazı Uncategorized içinde yayınlandı. Kalıcı bağlantıyı yer imlerinize ekleyin.

Bir Cevap Yazın

Aşağıya bilgilerinizi girin veya oturum açmak için bir simgeye tıklayın:

WordPress.com Logosu

WordPress.com hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Twitter resmi

Twitter hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Facebook fotoğrafı

Facebook hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Google+ fotoğrafı

Google+ hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Connecting to %s