Beyond a petition that calls for peace

Nothing can better describe the current madness which has taken hold of Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) and its mouthpieces in the media — about the witch hunt that threatens the security of more than 1,000 academics who signed the peace petition — than the hate campaign targeting one of them, Aslı Iğsız.

Iğsız, an assistant professor of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies at New York University, is the daughter of a former army commander, Hasan Iğsız. The latter was one of the top figures among the accused in the Ergenekon case, convicted to lifetime imprisonment, but released when the case collapsed due to a series of wrongdoings regarding the evidence.

A brilliant scholar, Aslı Iğsız was among those who signed the petition that called for accountability by the AKP government and a return to peace negotiations.

As the venomous witch hunt from top down was launched against the signatories, soon enough, she and her father found themselves in the line of fire.

As the accusations were no less than “military traitor and daughter,” the former general recently issued a statement through his lawyer, saying that despite disagreeing with the text of the petition campaign, he was deeply concerned that his daughter “whom he had raised by promoting independent and critical mindset should be disrespected this way and that he was worried about the wounds the latest lynch campaign had opened.”

The pro-government media’s response was relentless.

The daily Star on Monday let us know that “Aslı Iğsız is reported to be married to a Spanish Jew by the name of Eduardo Matos Martin.” This is only a simple, single case, illustrating how shameless, poisonous and dangerous the threats are against anybody who expresses dissent, exercises her/his right to protest against President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s tightly controlled and conducted hard-line policies in Turkey.

As the polarization increases, also by a series of violence raising concerns about how the “Syrianization” is speeding up, the academics’ petition has apparently come to mean a rupture point in Turkey’s ever-interesting story. It now clarifies a fault line between the pro- and anti-democracy camps, as well as puts to test each sector on where individuals stand in terms of basic freedoms.

In some ways, the fact that academics are joined by some colleagues at home and abroad — by their foreign colleagues — and others are encouraging. Although a few in the media and academia, in the political opposition and the Hizmet movement are still mumbling around “buts” and “ifs,” the support line is widening. Yesterday a total of 624 journalists joined the circles of cinematographers and authors who had backed the campaign. It is a positive sign that the Writers’ and Journalists’ Union (GYV) also joined the ranks, closing the ranks for democratic rights.

And the most peculiar support came from the 27 fan groups of more than 12 football teams — including Fenerbahçe, Beşiktaş and Galatasaray — declaring yesterday that “we shall not be part of this crime,” in support of the scholars.

In many ways, it seemed to me that the petition would be a sharp curve again in Turkey’s story. Just by thuggishly challenging the independence of opinion at academia, the witch hunt against it was crying for big consequences, calling for conscientious choices, and exposing how close Turkey comes to an abyss of despotism, sort of a wake-up call for the apathetic West.

It told everyone that the AKP was now ready to gobble the university freedom up, after bringing the judiciary down to its knees and suffocating the media.

“The current government has been waging a long and systematic drive to take control of Turkish higher education,” wrote Kadir Yıldırım, a research scholar with Rice University, for the Washington Post.

“This latest effort by Erdoğan amounts to no less than a redesign of academia in his own image, as in many other sectors of life in the country. Turkish academia, long considered among conservative circles to be a bastion of secular, modern and anti-religion intelligentsia, is being overhauled. The administrators are fully compliant with the demands of the political top brass… Erdoğan’s attack on the petition-signing scholars is not about the content of the petition. It primarily aims to domesticate the remaining oppositional voices within the academia.”

About yavuzbaydar

Yavuz Baydar 39 yıllık gazeteci. Mesleğe İsveç Radyosu'nda muhabir olarak başladı, oradan TV ve yazılı basına geçti. Sırasıyla Cumhuriyet İsveç muhabirliği, BBC Türkçe Servisi'nde yapımcı-sunuculuk, Yeni Yüzyıl'da dış haberler servis şefliği, Milliyet'te editörlük yaptı. 1999 yılı başında Milliyet Okur Temsilcisi olarak, medyada kurumsal bir 'özdenetim' yapısı olan ombudsmanlığı Türkiye'ye tanıtan ve ilk uygulayan kişi oldu. Bu görevi Milliyet ardından Sabah'ta da sürdürdü. Toplam 15 yıl süren bu görevi nedeniyle dünyanın en kıdemli ve 'uzman' ombudsmanlarından biri sayılıyor. Baydar, merkezi ABD'de bulunan Dünya Medya Ombudsmanları Örgütü'nde (ONO) başkanlık ve yürütme kurulu üyeliğini de üstlendi. Türkiye'ye döndüğü 1990'lı yılların ortasından bu yana çeşitli TV kanallarında başta Soru-Cevap olmak üzere çok sayıda analiz-tartışma programını hazırlayıp sunmuş olan Baydar, düzenli olarak Süddeutsche Zeitung ve The Arab Weekly için yorumlar yazmakta. Baydar, Ocak 2014'te bir grup meslektaşı ile beraber medya bağımsızlığı ve özgürlüğü alanında çalışmalar yürütmek üzere Bağımsız Gazetecilik Platformu'nun (P24) kurucu üyeleri arasında yer aldı. 2000 yılında 'Okur Temsilcisi' olarak yaptığı çalışmalar nedeniyle Çağdaş Gazeteciler Derneği'nin (ÇGD) Özel Ödülü'ne layık bulunan Baydar, 2014 yılında da, Avrupa'nın 'Pulitzer'i sayılan Avrupa Basın Ödülü'nü (EPP) 'meslekte mükemmeliyet' tanımlamasıyla aldı. 2004'te Michigan Üniversitesi'nde Knight-Wallace Araştırma Bursu ile 'Ortadoğu, demokrasi ve medya' konulu mesleki çalışmalar yapan Baydar, 2014 sonbaharında da Harvard Üniversitesi'ne bağlı Kennedy School'da 'Shorenstein Fellow' olarak Türkiye medyasında sansürün ve mali yozlaşmanın yayılmasını ele alan uzun bir rapor yayınladı. Baydar ayrıca Guardian, El Pais, New York Times gibi gazetelere de aralıklı olarak yorum ve analiz makaleleri yazıyor.
Bu yazı Uncategorized içinde yayınlandı. Kalıcı bağlantıyı yer imlerinize ekleyin.

Bir Cevap Yazın

Aşağıya bilgilerinizi girin veya oturum açmak için bir simgeye tıklayın:

WordPress.com Logosu

WordPress.com hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Twitter resmi

Twitter hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Facebook fotoğrafı

Facebook hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Google+ fotoğrafı

Google+ hesabınızı kullanarak yorum yapıyorsunuz. Log Out / Değiştir )

Connecting to %s